<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2005 Giant Trance review</title>
	<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/</link>
	<description>Mountain bike news, reviews, and original features</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 01:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: BeenAroundTom</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-34667</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 21:47:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-34667</guid>
					<description>Great review. Glad I read this and was impressed with purchasing my '05 Trance 4 shortly after reading this. Took her out to Fremont Older (Cupertino, CA); rode her the next morning and yes, it rides smooth for a 3 year old bike..... Definetly a major upgrade from a NRS2 that is probably going to have a phat for sale sign on it soon:) I highly recommend getting a Trance 4 and converting to Trance 1 specs or lacing the ride with your favorite components. Save money and have a killer bike.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Great review. Glad I read this and was impressed with purchasing my &#8216;05 Trance 4 shortly after reading this. Took her out to Fremont Older (Cupertino, CA); rode her the next morning and yes, it rides smooth for a 3 year old bike&#8230;.. Definetly a major upgrade from a NRS2 that is probably going to have a phat for sale sign on it soon:) I highly recommend getting a Trance 4 and converting to Trance 1 specs or lacing the ride with your favorite components. Save money and have a killer bike.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-29975</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-29975</guid>
					<description>Quick update: I'm still running the bike and after 2 years, no real problems. I'm pretty surprised given the amount of trail it sees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Quick update: I&#8217;m still running the bike and after 2 years, no real problems. I&#8217;m pretty surprised given the amount of trail it sees.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: neily</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-29706</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 19:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-29706</guid>
					<description>i think trances rock !

ive had mine since june and it rocks at evrything 

i love them !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>i think trances rock !</p>
	<p>ive had mine since june and it rocks at evrything </p>
	<p>i love them !
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: Wes</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-21650</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 03:51:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-21650</guid>
					<description>I'm bidding on an 05 Trance frame at the moment, an upgrade from my aging old hardtail.  I've pedalled a couple of Trances at the local bikestores and really like the feel of the suspension.  I wish I had the budget to plop down a new X0, but I'm confident from the reviews here and elsewhere this is going to be a quantum leap for me.  I'll move over my Juicys, Marzocchi Bomber, Atlas crankset, and probably toss X.9 dlrs on it, along with my current tractor wheels: Rhyno Lites on XT hubs.

I'll post back when I get it built and take it for a thrash in Nobel Canyon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;m bidding on an 05 Trance frame at the moment, an upgrade from my aging old hardtail.  I&#8217;ve pedalled a couple of Trances at the local bikestores and really like the feel of the suspension.  I wish I had the budget to plop down a new X0, but I&#8217;m confident from the reviews here and elsewhere this is going to be a quantum leap for me.  I&#8217;ll move over my Juicys, Marzocchi Bomber, Atlas crankset, and probably toss X.9 dlrs on it, along with my current tractor wheels: Rhyno Lites on XT hubs.</p>
	<p>I&#8217;ll post back when I get it built and take it for a thrash in Nobel Canyon.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: Al</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-13345</link>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 05:19:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-13345</guid>
					<description>I've got the same model, and I absolutely love it. I've built it up for XC racing, and while not the lightest bike, it has helped me get some top fives. I've upgraded it quite a bit to essentially the specs Trance 1 with X0 twisters, and Maxxis ADvantage tires, and whoa mama the thing moves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>I&#8217;ve got the same model, and I absolutely love it. I&#8217;ve built it up for XC racing, and while not the lightest bike, it has helped me get some top fives. I&#8217;ve upgraded it quite a bit to essentially the specs Trance 1 with X0 twisters, and Maxxis ADvantage tires, and whoa mama the thing moves!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: andreas</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-5354</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:42:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-5354</guid>
					<description>Good review. 
I am interested particularly in the rear shock bottoming out.
Is it due to the shock size (6.5x1.5)? Or, perhaps, lack of adequate pressure?
Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Good review.<br />
I am interested particularly in the rear shock bottoming out.<br />
Is it due to the shock size (6.5&#215;1.5)? Or, perhaps, lack of adequate pressure?<br />
Thanks
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: Cory</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3096</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 14:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3096</guid>
					<description>Stef. 

The Trance can manage smooth 5' drops to tranny without problems. I do notice its limitations (relatively steep head angle, 4&quot; travel) on steep and rocky sections of trail -- it's just not as fast as a bike with a little more travel.

As for a longer front fork, I've only run my 36 at full travel once and I didn't like it a lot. The bike didn't climb well at all and it was a little sluggish when it came to ripping around turns and things like that.

For what it's worth, the 6&quot; travel Reign isn't a whole lot different from the Trance and it gives you a little more travel to play with. If I were riding more 'light freeride' stuff, I'd look seriously at that frame as an option.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Stef. </p>
	<p>The Trance can manage smooth 5&#8242; drops to tranny without problems. I do notice its limitations (relatively steep head angle, 4&#8243; travel) on steep and rocky sections of trail &#8212; it&#8217;s just not as fast as a bike with a little more travel.</p>
	<p>As for a longer front fork, I&#8217;ve only run my 36 at full travel once and I didn&#8217;t like it a lot. The bike didn&#8217;t climb well at all and it was a little sluggish when it came to ripping around turns and things like that.</p>
	<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, the 6&#8243; travel Reign isn&#8217;t a whole lot different from the Trance and it gives you a little more travel to play with. If I were riding more &#8216;light freeride&#8217; stuff, I&#8217;d look seriously at that frame as an option.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: Stef</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3095</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Oct 2006 12:58:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3095</guid>
					<description>Nice review!
I'm concerned about the Trances' ability to take bigger hits. I'm talking 5 footers to tranny, gnarly rock gardens etc. Also how's the handling with the fork extended? Say I put  a Pike and run it at full travel (140mm), will it get sloggy and wobbly?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>Nice review!<br />
I&#8217;m concerned about the Trances&#8217; ability to take bigger hits. I&#8217;m talking 5 footers to tranny, gnarly rock gardens etc. Also how&#8217;s the handling with the fork extended? Say I put  a Pike and run it at full travel (140mm), will it get sloggy and wobbly?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: koan</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3028</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 10:37:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-3028</guid>
					<description>good review. 

but: giant has no &quot;linear travel&quot; bikes, the trance frame has a leverage ratio of 1:2.3 at the beginning an 1:1.9 at end of travel, so it is progressive. 

i'm using the bike as an do-it-all secondary bike for tour/dirt/whatever in frame size Small with Pike in front 

Great Bike!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>good review. </p>
	<p>but: giant has no &#8220;linear travel&#8221; bikes, the trance frame has a leverage ratio of 1:2.3 at the beginning an 1:1.9 at end of travel, so it is progressive. </p>
	<p>i&#8217;m using the bike as an do-it-all secondary bike for tour/dirt/whatever in frame size Small with Pike in front </p>
	<p>Great Bike!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2005 Giant Trance review by: The current ride: My 2005 Giant Trance &#187; The Biking Hub: Mountain</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-2895</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Aug 2006 22:46:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2005-giant-trance-review/#comment-2895</guid>
					<description>[...] Frame: 2005 Giant Trance (18&amp;#8243;). I&amp;#8217;ve been running an upgraded 2005 Giant Trance 4 frame for the past three months or so. I like pretty much everything about the frame, although I was surprised to find a small chunk missing from the tubing around the shock mount. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] Frame: 2005 Giant Trance (18&#8243;). I&#8217;ve been running an upgraded 2005 Giant Trance 4 frame for the past three months or so. I like pretty much everything about the frame, although I was surprised to find a small chunk missing from the tubing around the shock mount. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
