<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/1.5.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer</title>
	<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2006-rocky-mountain-slayer/</link>
	<description>Mountain bike news, reviews, and original features</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 20:30:29 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=1.5.2</generator>

	<item>
 		<title>Comment on 2006 Rocky Mountain Slayer by: NSMB reviews the 2006 Rocky Mountain Switch 2.0 &#187; The Biking Hub</title>
		<link>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2006-rocky-mountain-slayer/#comment-170</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:14:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.thebikinghub.com/mtb/2006-rocky-mountain-slayer/#comment-170</guid>
					<description>[...] While my favourite Rocky Mountain for 2006 is still the Slayer, the Switch runs a close second. Featuring a lower front end and better standover height than the previous incarnation of the bike, the 2006 Switch is a little more &amp;#8217;snug&amp;#8217; than last year, something that will make both descents and climbs a little more pleasant. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[	<p>[&#8230;] While my favourite Rocky Mountain for 2006 is still the Slayer, the Switch runs a close second. Featuring a lower front end and better standover height than the previous incarnation of the bike, the 2006 Switch is a little more &#8217;snug&#8217; than last year, something that will make both descents and climbs a little more pleasant. [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
