Reviews » Dan

First Look at the 2006 Cannondale Rush 1000

The 2006 Cannondale Rush 1000

Cannondale is like the little company that could. An extremely strong competitor during the mountain bike boom in the early 1990s, Cannondale was a victim of its own success when it tried to expand into motorized toys, only to stretch itself too thin and slip into Chapter 11. However, out of the ashes grew an even better company, one that was entirely focused on making some of the best bicycles in the world.

Cannondale added the Scalpel cross country racing bike and the Gemini Freeride bike to its line in 2002 and both lines were expanded because of their success.

In 2004 the company unveiled the Aaron Chase signature line of hardtail dirt jumper/park bikes and then in 2005 it rolled out a little project called the Prophet. The idea was simple: One bike, many uses.

As with the rest of the Cannondale line, the Prophet was built in America and was a fantastic bike. Five inches of travel on either end and available in six models ranging from the entry-level 600 up to the high-buck Team Replica 4X model.

I had the pleasure of testing a Prophet 600 for the 2005 season and was blown away by how good the bike was. I used it in situations from short cross country races to 24-hour enduros to all-mountain gravity-fed jaunts. It didn’t matter if you were going up or down, the Prophet felt solid either way.

Because the Prophet is marketed as a do-it-all bike, weight wasn’t a huge concern. The Prophet 600 weighed in at around 31 pounds out of the box, however, which meant it was a bit heavy for serious racing.

So with that in mind, you can imagine my excitement when I happened upon the 2006 Cannondale Rush while cruising the show floor at Interbike in Las Vegas last September. At first glance the Rush looked like a Prophet on a diet. It had the same great-looking lines, only with slimmer tubes and cross-country geometry rather than the adjustable geometry on the Prophet.

I had to have one. The Prophet went on the auction block and a shiny new 2006 Rush 1000 came ‘home’ - ready for a season’s worth of racing, riding and enjoyment.

The Specs

The Rush 1000 is about halfway up the ladder of the 2006 Rush line, but its spec sheet reads like the higher end models for many cross country bikes. The drivetrain is primarily SRAM with X-7 shifters, X-9 rear derailleur and a 970 cassette. The crankset included is a FSA Afterburner, the front derailleur is a Shimano LX and braking power comes from the Avid Juicy7 hydraulics.

Suspension comes by way of a Fox Float RP3 rear shock, which is custom tuned to the Rush by the Fox factory, and up front the Rush features the tried and true Lefty design. In the case of the 1000, the Lefty used is the Speed Bonded DLR2, which includes a lockout lever.

The wheelset included is a Mavic Crossland UST and wrapped around them are Mavic’s new Crossmark XC tubeless tires. Other highlights on the bike are a Fi’zi:k Nisene saddle, FSA bars and CrankBrothers Eggbeater pedals.

The good

Although saddle time has been somewhat limited on the Rush (thanks to an early start to winter here in Ontario), I have been blown away by what the minds at Cannondale have made. The Prophet was clearly a fantastic all-mountain bike, but it was simply too heavy for any serious cross country endeavors. I was able to get a medium Prophet down to about 27.5 pounds with a full XTR drivetrain, Mavic Crossmax wheels, lightweight racing tires and a carbon bar, but it still rode like a heavier bike – which is to say a bit sluggish going up, and wonderfully cushy going down.

The Rush, however, accomplishes exactly what the Cannondale designers have set out for. With four inches of travel at either corner, it’s still enough squish to get over obstacles and make going downhill a breeze, but where the Rush really starts to perform is when you hit the bottom of a killer incline. With a quick flip of the lockout lever on the Lefty and moving the Fox RP3’s ProPedal switch to the firmest setting, the Rush blasts up a hill like a hardtail. Even without touching either lever, the Rush still climbs with very little bob.

The other highlight feature of the Rush is its weight. Out of the box, my Rush came in at just 28 pounds, although it rides like something lighter. By swapping out the wheelset and heavy FSA cranks, you can easily shave a couple of pounds. By the time the first major race of the year rolls around, I expect the Rush 1,000 can burn off enough calories to hit the sub 25-pound mark, which is incredible for a relatively inexpensive full-suspension bike.

And although looks shouldn’t be the deciding factor in picking a bike, it’s hard to argue the Rush doesn’t look great. The 1000 comes in the team replica paint scheme which is clearcoated brushed aluminum and black with Maxxis Orange highlights.

The Lefty fork may look odd, but it’s one of the stiffest and lightest front forks available. It doesn’t feel as lopsided as you might think it would by looking at it, and changing the front tire or repairing a flat is a breeze because you don’t have to take the wheel off.

The not-so-good

While the UST setup on the Mavic Crossland is great for some people, if you’re not a fan of riding tubeless you’re out of luck. The Crosslands are built a bit heavier with the tubeless setup in mind, and the Maxxis Crossmark tires also have extra sidewall protection and are designed for a tubeless setup. The problem is, despite trying a few different fixes, I had trouble keeping the air from seeping out, so I decided to switch over to a traditional setup, which made the heavy tires and rims seem like overkill.

The other problem I ran into was with the Fox RP3 shock. After only a few rides the shock developed a problem of air leaking into the negative chamber and went into “stuck-down” mode, which meant it wouldn’t return to its ‘normal’ position. The good news is, I shipped the shock out to Cycleworks in Edmonton, which is one of two Canadian Fox warranty service centres, and I had it back in my hands repaired at no cost in less than a week.

Summary

Simply put, the Rush is fantastic. Initial results are extremely positive and it should be an interesting season of cross country racing. Pricing for the Rush 1000 comes in at around $2,500 US, which may seem a bit high, but considering the build kit on it and the fact it is a made-in-the USA bike, I feel it is worth it. If you compare that price to other options on the market, it’s more than fair.

For more information on the Rush, visit the Cannondale website — it’s loaded with fantastic information on the entire Rush line.

And keep an eye on The Biking Hub for an updated review later this year.

24 Responses to “First Look at the 2006 Cannondale Rush 1000”

1. Posted by 2006 Cannondale Rush » The Biking Hub | 10:26 pm, 8 January 2006

[…] Update (6 January 2006): Dan just posted his initial impressions of the 2006 Cannondale Rush 1000. Looks like I have to eat my words regarding Cannondale’s reliance on in-house products — the Rush 1000 looks well-spec’d with components from a range of manufacturers. […]

2. Posted by Graham | 7:26 am, 9 January 2006

I gave the Rush a ride while at Interbike this past fall. I don’t think the rear suspension was dialed in properly so I don’t think my first impressions would be fair…one reason I didn’t review it on my site. The one problem I noticed, however, is that the chainstays flare out more than most bikes I have ridden. The rear of my feet would keep hitting the chainstays. Not enough to throw me completely, but enough to be a bother. I wear U.S. size 12 monsters.

3. Posted by Blue Collar Mountain Biking » Making It Easier is now The Biking Hub » Mountain Bike News, Reviews, How Tos and Deals | 5:22 am, 10 January 2006

[…] And don’t freak out, Cory is putting all the content from MIE on the new site. You can already chech out a first look at the 2006 Cannondale Rush 1000 on TheBikingHub.com. […]

4. Posted by Contributor introduction: Dan » The Biking Hub | 9:45 am, 10 January 2006

[…] Now that my first ‘official’ story is out of the way, I figured it was time to introduce myself. […]

5. Posted by Dan | 12:52 pm, 10 January 2006

Hi Graham. In response to your comment about the chainstay issue…I’ve never noticed the problem, but I’m guessing that’s because I’m used to the design. I spent 2005 on a C-Dale Prophet with even bigger stays, so I found it an easy transition to the Rush. I’m also not wearing Size 12’s :)

As for the rear shock, those RP3s definitely need to be dialed in. That’s the one draw back about demo days is it’s impossible to get the bike “just right”. You never get a true feel for bikes because seat posts aren’t at the right height, crank lengths might be off, stem lengths are different, shocks are dialed in differently etc. etc.

Cheers
Dan

6. Posted by BC | 4:13 pm, 27 January 2006

Very nice review. Wish I had the money to upgrade to that beast.

7. Posted by Dan | 4:27 pm, 28 January 2006

Price-wise the Rush line is surprisingly reasonable. The nice thing is you can buy even the most low-end Rush and you’re getting the same frame used on all of the models right up to the Team model.

Cheers,
Dan

8. Posted by 2006 Giant Anthem review by CyclingNews.com » The Biking Hub | 4:01 pm, 22 February 2006

[…] Based on the number of people coming to The Biking Hub who are looking for information about the Giant Anthem, Giant’s new cross country racer is one of two new bikes that are really generating a lot of buzz in the xc world (the other is the Cannondale Rush). Ever since the bike was unveiled on the trade show circuit in 2005, there’s been plenty of talk about the Anthem and rightly so. Built around Giant’s well-received Maestro suspension platform, the Anthem is set to replace the venerable NRS as the company’s dedicated cross country race bike. […]

9. Posted by Cory | 3:17 pm, 26 February 2006

I had a little bit of saddle time on a Rush 1000 today and was impressed by the ’spryness’ of the bike — it felt quick and agile on the climb and cornered pretty well in the parking lot. For all of you naysayers out there, the Lefty was a non-issue and I adjusted pretty much automatically.

My only criticism from the brief time I spent on the bike was the X7 rear shifter — it’s certainly nowhere near as nice as its up-spec X9 cousin.

10. Posted by Dan | 4:43 am, 27 February 2006

Yeah those X7 shifters are definitely on my upgrade list. Coming from a full XTR drivetrain, the X7 stuff is a bit weak.

But the X9 rear derailleur is a nice touch.

Dan

11. Posted by Kurt | 11:23 am, 30 March 2006

Dan;
How do you like the Rush vs the Prophet? I have a prophet now and looking at going to the Rush.

12. Posted by Dan | 6:33 am, 3 April 2006

I would say it all depends on what your focus is. If you’re into more all-mountain stuff and maybe doing some drops, stunts etc., stick with the Prophet.

But if your focus is cross country riding or doing any XC racing, switch to the Rush. It’s a bike designed to go fast and is a fantastic longer-distance race bike for events such as enduros and 24-hour events.

Dan

13. Posted by Patrick Sullivan | 10:53 am, 2 May 2006

Thanks for the review. It was one of the deciding factors for my frame swap to Cdale of my 2002 Jykell 3000 to the Rush. The cost is around 1k, but I think it’s the right move. Any thoughts from you?

Thanks

Sully

14. Posted by Dan | 10:27 am, 4 May 2006

The Jekyll and Rush are definitely two different bikes. If the Rush will fit your riding style, then it’s defintiely worth the thousand dollar upgrade cost…especially if that includes a new Lefty fork.

If not, keep in mind the technology on the Lefty’s has greatly improved over the past few years, so you would be missing out on one of the Rush’s high points by using an older fork.

Let me know how it all works out!

Dan

15. Posted by Steve | 10:00 pm, 13 May 2006

Here is a suggestion for those of you that would love to buy a 1000 but would like to stay south of the $2000 price tag.
I just upgraded from a Cannondale hardtail that I have raced for the last 8 years to the Rush 600. I was in the market for the 1000, but found that since the frame and lefty are the same on both models, I was able to build roughly the same bike by swapping out components, at the same weight (28 lbs) for $2000 on the nose. I saved $600 and have about the same bike. I am missing out on the adjustable RP3 rear shock, but find that the preset on the standard float is just fine. I also found that I can upgrade the shock to the adjustable for about $170, still saving some cash. I have to echo everything you said in the review. The bob is minimal, and it feels very fast even after years on a hardtail. Bottom line, my lap times are faster and I have the energy to ride longer.

16. Posted by Cory | 3:35 pm, 14 May 2006

For all of you haters out there, you’ll be disappointed to learn that ‘Cannondale’ and ‘Rush’ are the top search terms on this site, although they’re followed closely by ‘Giant Trance’.

Either way, the Rush is proving to be a popular bike for all sorts of riders.

17. Posted by Dan | 8:05 pm, 14 May 2006

There are some issues with the RP3 shock found on the Rush. I’ve been in contact with both Fox and Cannondale and there was a seal problem with certain production dates.

If you have a Rush, I’d look into it before you have a problem.

Dan

18. Posted by NS2000X | 9:02 am, 17 May 2006

I have a Rush 2000, and have to this date, had no problems with my RP3. Dan - how might I identify a problem shock before it (possibly) fails?

For the record, I love my Rush and think the RP3 is a huge factor. Those that are on Rush 4/6/800’s I highly recommend the RP3 upgrade!

19. Posted by Cory | 9:31 am, 17 May 2006

To check if you’ve got one of the wonky RP3s, you should bring your bike into your local Cannondale dealer. They’ll be able to tell if yours has a faulty shock by looking at the serial number and comparing it to a list provided by the manufacturer.

As Dan mentioned, this issue doesn’t affect all of the Rushes out there — only a limited number of them. There is a small amount of traffic coming to this site looking specifically for the problem Dan describes, so I don’t think all of you happy Rush owners be too concerned about it.

Hope that helps.

20. Posted by Mark | 11:08 am, 24 May 2006

In response to Graham’s comments about the RUSH’s flared-out chainstay.

I purchased a RUSH 1000 about 3 months ago and the paint is worn away on the chainstay (right down to the aluminum - only on the right side!) from my size 10’s.

21. Posted by Dan | 4:04 am, 26 May 2006

Hmmm…that sounds to me like you have a cleat alignment issue. That definitely shouldn’t happen.

I’d recommend going to a LBS and getting a proper fitting done.

Dan

22. Posted by juanma | 9:57 am, 4 June 2006

pues, es una buena bicileta…

23. Posted by Dwayne | 8:04 pm, 23 August 2006

Hey, I just bought a lower end Rush and wanted to know in what order you think I should start upgrading. It doesn’t have a Lefty and has a Radium rear shock but for a grand, ready to ride, I thought it was a great place to start.

24. Posted by Dan | 3:17 am, 24 August 2006

Personally I’m a huge fan of the Lefty fork so if you’re looking to lighten it up go with that.

Get the DLR2 from a 2006 though, don’t get something that wasn’t designed for the Rush. Second choice should be going to the Fox Float RP3 or 2007 RP23 shock and then look at getting some nice light wheels.

Cheers,
Dan

Add your thoughts: